The biggest story in America right now is the story that nobody is talking about.
Yet …
But, you heard it here first - the Democrats are self destructing – and not a moment too soon if our precious Country is to be preserved.
This should have been an easy election for President Obama. After all, “Hope and Change” was such an emotional call for action in 2008 that he knocked off the powerful Clinton organization to surprisingly win the Democratic nomination, then easily defeated John McCain to become the 44th President. History was made. In fact, so sweeping was his victory that the Democrats controlled Capital Hill, creating clear legislative sailing for the new Troika in town, Obama, Reid and Pelosi. Pundits like James Carville crowed that the GOP would not recover for 40 years.
What a difference four years makes. Hope was quickly replaced by arrogance, and change was dictated from behind closed doors. Bi-partisanship? Gone with the win. Legislation was jammed down the throats of Republicans without input or compromise, let alone the approval of We the People - especially without the consent of the governed. Billions were spent on “shovel-ready” jobs that weren’t shovel-ready. The UAW was bailed out under the guise of an auto bail out. Billions were spent on so-called green energy projects that produced much political windage, and billions in bankruptcies, but no energy. The debt raged out of control. Class warfare was declared on success. President Bush was blamed for just about … everything.
How ungracious. How, “What me worry?”
It was all just too much.
The people answered back in 2010 as Republicans rallied across the Country. Even Massachusetts, a political wasteland for too many taxpayers taxed a lifetime without representation, rebelled. And now, amid all the polarization and conflicting rhetoric, what do we have to show for the past four years? A Nation careening down the wrong track. Growing numbers of people dependent on government, an even larger number who no longer trust their leaders, or the media, and the danger of a self-fulfilling pessimism about the future. Is this what we deserve from government? Is this the American way?
There have now been three debates. What have we learned?
- Gone is even the pretext of “Hope and Change”. Obama has been reduced to an uninspiring shadow of the hologram candidate of 2008 in front of the phony pillars. His lofty, though undefined goals of four years ago have been replaced by contempt and condescension. But little hope. He is just another Chicago pol.
- Instead of defending their record, or promoting the long term value of what they have done for America, or (especially) setting forth their plan to improve the Nation in a second term, Obama and Biden choose instead to tear down their opponents, as if their values are somehow scary and fear inducing.
- However, while most Liberals appreciate red meat attacks, an increasing number of unenrolled voters are realizing that while it is more convenient for the Democrats to debase their opponents than defend their record or describe their vision, they expect more for their vote this time around than empty rhetoric.
- After watching Joe Biden’s outrageous and condescending debate performance, if bi-partisanship is an important goal, how many voters can even imagine the possibility of inter-party cooperation with the current Administration in charge?
- If likeability is important, how many voters can consider Obama’s disinterested first debate performance as representative of an engaged, let alone inspiring leader? For that matter, what if this Obama now had been that Obama then? There would have been a Clinton.
- If trust is important, how many voters have been turned off by Obama’s inability – or refusal - to be truthful on the Libyan situation? And, haven’t we all been through this cover-up situation before? Don’t we expect more from our Presidents?
- If an improving quality of life is important, how can voters be impressed by the Obama energy policy, and the new normal of $4+/gallon, higher electricity and heating fuel prices. And, how does this translate in terms of higher food prices, and anything that must be moved to reach consumers? And less disposable income?
- What about jobs? Is there anyone who doubts that more people will be added to the list of food stamp dependents than get jobs in an Obama second term? Perhaps a better question is how many will be able to get off the list?
- Or, how about the debt? If America is paying $4B/day to borrow the funds to cover excessive spending, how much more will it cost when the debt rises to over $20B - at a likely higher interest rate - by 2016? And, how will this cripple the Country, let alone diminish the futures for our children and grandchildren?
Four years ago few Republicans would have predicted the surging enthusiasm for their candidate against the once iconic Obama. However, we have all seen that “Hope and Change” was a hoax, little more than a modern day Trojan Donkey. We have witnessed the crumbling of Obama’s pedestal, like a sand castle at high tide, as he has squandered the goodwill and patience of the American people. We see desperation, not forward thinking. We hear more talk about saving Obama’s presidency, as if that takes precedence over saving our Country. We see an America that we increasingly do not recognize, and do not like.
In a process totally corrupted by too many dollars and negative ads, the debates have provided the only real clarity of the campaign. The candidates are finally who they are, not who their opponents try to depict them to be – and America is seeing them through the unfiltered lenses of their televisions in the privacy of their homes. That Romney and Ryan are surging tells us something important. There is a desperate need to get the Country refocused and redirected. Obama cannot do it. We know that now.
The end result is clear. What was supposed to be a rout is now in serious doubt. All the anticipated denials and comments from the “usual suspects” cannot refute the old truism, “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” We cannot afford to be fooled again, and won't be. We the People deserve better. We need better.
What do you want America to be? There are 20 days to decide.
Chris M
10:02 am on Thursday, October 18, 2012
Jim...I could not help myself (partial lyrics)....Go Mitt
We'll be fighting in the streets
With our children at our feet
And the morals that they worship will be gone
And the men who spurred us on
Sit in judgment of all wrong
They decide and the shotgun sings the song
I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around me
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
And I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again
Don't get fooled again
Change it had to come
We knew it all along
We were liberated from the fall that's all
But the world looks just the same
And history ain't changed
'Cause the banners, they all flown in the last war
I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around me
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
And I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again
Don't get fooled again
No, no!
Jim Hatherley
1:07 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012
Chris ... Can I rule out Shakespeare?
Amy Buttiglieri
7:53 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Good one, Chris - I never thought about the lyrics, before (Jim - it's the Who... :-)
Maybe we can learn something from the 60's rebels (not to be confused with the 70's hippies...).
Ben Jackson
11:32 am on Monday, October 22, 2012
And just who do you think the people who wrote that song of soul-searchign and youthful engagement will be supporting in this election?
http://www.uncut.co.uk/the-who/the-whos-townshend-praises-barack-obama-at-us-show-news
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/15/the-who-nostalgic-pro-oba_n_112795.html
FindBalance
12:06 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012
For those of you who don't get the point (Ben), I re-post:
I'm getting confused about the intent of using this song as anyone's campaign song, so let me just say this.
There is a clear difference in this election. If we are going to be fooled by both sides anyway, I'd rather be fooled by the one Who (pun intended) favors the private sector as the solutions to our problems (Romney) than the one Who favors govt-provided/centric solutions (Obama).
[...regardless of who The Who osupport]
Chris M
2:40 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012
Yes you can, however they do come from the same country...
Concerned Citizen
7:31 am on Friday, October 19, 2012
Jim,
The three debates have shown the American people that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are bright, capable candidates, who love their country and have a much different vision for the future of America. I think it's telling that on the stump, President Obama is telling jokes about Big Bird and "binders" in an attempt to belittle Mitt Romney, rather than explaining specifically what he will do to create jobs. I think it's telling that the Democratic PACs have female Hollywood actors in ads trying to scare women by portraying Mitt Romney as anti-women. I think it's telling that President Obama looks worried and appears less confident (just my opinion based on watching him in two debates and at the Al Smith dinner last night in NYC).
I think the American people got a good look at Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan and liked what they saw, and I think President Obama knows it.
Jim Hatherley
9:36 am on Friday, October 19, 2012
I agree with you, Concerned Citizen. Yesterday's news was quite revealing. THe Feds paid over $1Trillion in welfare/food stamp payments last year - up by 32%. Everyone knows that this is unsustainable and must be reined in. Obama cannot do this because he wants to expand government spending, not reduce it.
The other recent news is the increasing rejection of the Democrats by women. There are growing numbers of commentaries that women are more concerned about the state of the economy than just contraception and abortion. I see this playing out for both Mitt Romney and Scott Brown.
SAT
8:37 am on Friday, October 19, 2012
For Chris M.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIHJ9RMAVGI
Chris M
9:04 am on Friday, October 19, 2012
Much better version...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htz9CS-Zmms&feature=related
Jim Hatherley
9:48 am on Friday, October 19, 2012
Chris, thanks for appending this video. I have been catching a lot of trash for not remembering this song, let alone knowing that it was performed by The Who.
Who knew?
Concerned Citizen
9:51 am on Friday, October 19, 2012
Chris M,
I think you've found the new campaign song for Romney/Ryan! Rock on!
Chris M
11:41 am on Friday, October 19, 2012
How about....Don't get fooled again
FindBalance
11:50 am on Friday, October 19, 2012
I'm getting confused about the intent of using this song as anyone's campaign song, so let me just say this.
There is a clear difference in this election. If we are going to be fooled by both sides anyway, I'd rather be fooled by the one Who (pun intended) favors the private sector as the solutions to our problems (Romney) than the one Who favors govt-provided/centric solutions (Obama).
Chris M
11:53 am on Friday, October 19, 2012
For the record...I'm a registered Republican....
Jim Hatherley
12:02 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
Thanks for getting this blog back on track, Find Balance. I think it is helpful to compare the Obama of 2012 with the "Hope and Change" Obama of 2008. Gone are the crowds and the enthusiasm. Gone are the fellow Democrats who insisted in being seen with Obama to get caught up in his coattails (does Obama even have a Democrat Senator stumping for him anymore),
All we have left are words - and those words are haunting Obama. For instance, as he said in 2008, when you don't have a record to run on, you make the election about little things and demonize your opponent. Sound familiar (Big Bird, Binders etc., plus a sea of ads accusing Romney of being a felon, a liar, an accomplice to a death etc.
The people have seen through this. Had Obama told America what his plans for the Country were during the 2008 campaign, he never would have been elected. He is still not telling the voters what he would do to the Country in a second term - but this time we are ready.
He fooled us once, but he's not going to fool us twice. Abraham Lincoln knew this and now the Narcissist-in-Chief is learning the same thing.
jhschool
10:59 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
Nice name calling. Keeping it classy.
Jim Hatherley
12:03 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
Chris, if you live in Westborough, perhaps you would like to come to one of my upcoming meetings and meet my members.
Stephen Faris
4:27 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
Hi jim,
My neighbor and I had Brown flyers on our lawns and they seemed to have disappeared. I guess Warrens people are getting nervous because of all the Brown flyers. A sure sign Brown will win. Do you know where I can get replacements and also Romney flyers for my front yard.
Thanks for all your good work!!
Steve Faris
Jim Hatherley
4:50 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
Steve, I hate to say that my signs were also stolen from my lawn, neighbors too ... Nobody is taking Obama and Warren signs because nobody wants them.
TBH
6:25 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
Jim... "Nobody is taking Obama and Warren signs because nobody wants them." Really?! Why then did you chime in about your stolen signs in the recent Patch article from Oct. 12th, that reported multiple Obama/Biden and Warren signs disappearing (as well as being defaced) from the lawns of Westborough? This is disingenuous at best...I would have expected better from you. Now who's fooling who?
Jim Hatherley
8:34 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
TBH, your sense of humor may be showing. How about redirecting your attention to the blog.
TBH
11:24 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
Ummm, sorry Jim, but I wasn't the one who brought up the lawn sign issue in the first place. Nice evasion of the question though, not unlike Mitt himself. Just trying to keep ya honest ;)
jhschool
11:27 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
Here is what I'm happy about. Universal healthcare. That's right. I like it. I liked it when Romney did it. I liked it when Obama did it. I'm also pretty happy to see 2 wars ending. You know, the ones costing thousands of lives and trillions of dollars? Yes. I am happy about that. I'm pretty pleased Bin Laden is dead. Thrilled there has been no more foreign terrorist attacks on US soil. I'm relieved I haven't been lied to about fake WMDs. I'm also happy my 401k balance is much higher than it was in October of 2008. You know, 4 years ago, the sky was FALLING in the economy. Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, AIG all collapse on the same day. I was in the industry, and I assure you, there was some very scary stuff going on. Things were on the path to be worse..much much worse...can't get your money out of the bank worse, but it didn't go there. I'm pleased Housing appears to be stabilized after it crashed 4 years ago. I couldn't be happier GM is still in business. And I just don't feel fooled. The man is President, not a miracle worker. It takes a long time to clean up after 8 years of George W Bush.
Stephen Faris
2:45 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Jessica,
You have really managed to confuse issues. My sense is that you made the decision to support Obama and then found reasons to justify it. Well lets review your claims:
1) The wars would have ended with or without Obama. They always do.
2) George Bush put in the tough anti-terrorist programs that resulted win what you like.
3) You can't prove things would have been worse in 08. Just your scare feeling.
4) GM still owned by the US tax payer. The stock has lost 50% of its value and GM continues to pump out poor vehicles. Please dont claim that as an Obama victory.
Meanwhile Stock holders and bond holders stiffed to pay the unions off.
5) AIG owned by the US tax payer. It is in process of liquidating itself to pay off the US tax payer. Meanwhile many exec and workers were paid millions for doing nothing.
6) I would not be to assured on 401K since we are approaching the fiscal cliff.
7) It will soon be clear that housing will not be as good as you think. It is similar to a dead cat bounce in stocks.
8) I believe your precious dumbocrats were in charge before Bush and contributed significantly to the demise of the US.
9) To be sure the unions, government workers and other Obama cronies
have benefitted from socialistic policies. The problem with socialism is that soon run out of other peoples money.
I am surprised that you are unaware of the list above.
Steve Faris
Jim Hatherley
7:01 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Jessica, thanks for your comment. Based on all of this, you are all set. That a lot of people do not see this President in the same context probably tells you that there are bigger issues out there that others are considering. What do you want America to be? What America do you want to leave to your children and grandchildren? And finally, ask yourself this - how many years will it take to dig out from this President?
Thanks again and all the best.
Amy Buttiglieri
8:01 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Troika: Russian carriage driven by three horses abreast (thefreedictionary.com). Good one, Jim. We all seem to be riding along in the carriage, don't we - all too busy with our jobs, kids, houses, tv shows, health issues. It seems the team of horses is going where it wants to go, rather than being driven by someone in the carriage.
Jim: I'd love to see an article on the differences between the political parties years ago (e.g. JFK years) and now. Someone said recently that the Dems today are really Liberals, not true Democrats. How have we changed over the years? Does my party vote stand for what my grandfather's stood for? And, if I may be so bold, is my grandfather voting for the same party all these years, thinking they stand for what they stood for when he paid strict attention to their goals and vision?
Jim Hatherley
11:38 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Thanks for picking up on the Troika point, Amy, but that's where we are. In a prior blog I actually did make the point about JFK Democrats vs. today's version of dependency liberals. Maybe they should be called the Dependocrats.
Shelli Sandrew
1:07 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Hardly crumbling. Funny that Mitt isn't being endorsed in any of his 'home states'. The most recent being The Salt Lake Tribune. To quote them: Nowhere has Mitt Romney’s pursuit of the presidency been more warmly welcomed or closely followed than here in Utah. The Republican nominee’s political and religious pedigrees, his adeptly bipartisan governorship of a Democratic state, and his head for business and the bottom line all inspire admiration and hope in our largely Mormon, Republican, business-friendly state…
In considering which candidate to endorse, The Salt Lake Tribune editorial board had hoped that Romney would exhibit the same talents for organization, pragmatic problem-solving and inspired leadership that he displayed here more than a decade ago. Instead, we have watched him morph into a friend of the far right, then tack toward the center with breathtaking aplomb. Through a pair of presidential debates, Romney’s domestic agenda remains bereft of detail and worthy of mistrust.
Therefore, our endorsement must go to the incumbent, a competent leader who, against tough odds, has guided the country through catastrophe and set a course that, while rocky, is pointing toward a brighter day. The president has earned a second term. Romney, in whatever guise, does not deserve a first. To read the rest of the article: http://www.politicususa.com/devastating-papers-endorsing-obama-president.html
Stephen Faris
2:59 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Jim,
Dick Morris has a very interesting video on Carter Reagon. Many people forget the lessons of history and continue to repeat them.
http://www.dickmorris.com/
Steve Faris
Jim Hatherley
3:25 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Thanks, Steve. I remember this election very well. What would have made this election even more similar is if Hillary Clinton had decided to run against Obama in the primary, just as Ted Kennedy ran against Carter. Carter shared similar characteristics as Obama. After 3 years most people realized he was not suited for the job. Dan Rather even asked him during a press conference if he thought he was competent enough to lead. Are you kidding me?
And this is why Obama made the big show of fund raising early and often - decaring he would have a war chest of $1B - to discourare Clinton from joining the fight. Here's the thing ... despite what Liberals say, I would bet they would have dropped Obama in a heart beat if Hillary could replace him.
Anyway, the 1980 election remained Ted Kennedy's finest hour and greatest accomplishment. Because of his sniping and weakening of Carter, he made it easier for Reagan to get elected. Whatever else he accomplished, nothing else possibly tops that contribution to America. Even his brother would have been proud of him for that.
Jim Hatherley
3:05 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Shellli, thanks for your note and perspective. The Salt Lake Tribune endorsement for Obama is certainly counterintiuitive. It will be intresting to see whatever post endorsement comments arise since Utah will certainly vote for Romney. But, we need to discount the legitimacy of the Boston Globe. They endorsed BOTH Jimmy Carter and John Anderson in 1980 because Ronald Reagan was a Republican. If they could not endorse Ronnie, how could any other Republican ever get the nod? This is what makes the Globe worthless, by the way.
Still, your note was restricted to copying/pasting what somebody else said. Hardly any creativity in that. I put together a piece that would inspire some independent thought. Anything original to add, or are you all set with all the Democrats?
Ben Jackson
9:24 am on Monday, October 22, 2012
"This should have been an easy election for President Obama"
Um, no. Congressional Republicans have stymied nearly everything the President has tried to accomplish - and yet he's kept us afloat in the greatest global economic crisis since the Great Depression - all along feeding into the birther paranoia and our worst selves. It was never going to be an easy election.
"Bi-partisanship? Gone with the win."
It sure was - Republicans became the party of "no" the very second the President was elected, using the filibuster at a level not just unprecedented, but damn near treasonous. They stopped nearly anything from happening and then screamed "LOOK! HE CAN'T DO ANYTHING." It was cynical, and put political power over the best interest of the nation.
"The UAW was bailed out under the guise of an auto bail out."
Huh. You typed "UAW" when you meant to type "GM." Weird typo.
" Class warfare was declared on success."
Actually, class warfare was declared on nearly all of us by Bush, Romney, AIG, Lehman Bros., and those very few who breathe that rarefied air, and our economy has still not recovered.
"The people answered back in 2010 as Republicans rallied across the Country."
You're flat-out wrong, here. Had there been a presidential election, Mr. Obama would have won. Had the GOP not spent so much effort blocking success in favor of political gains, this never would have happened. MA will fix when Ms. Warren wins.
Sassilady
9:18 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012
You say he has kept us afloat.....oh yes......by borrowing and borrowing from China, so he could keep giving handouts to people who have no desire to at least attempt to stand on their own two feet. My ancestors would be ashamed of us today.
Jim Hatherley
10:40 am on Monday, October 22, 2012
Ben, thank you for your note and valiant attempt to change history. We always seem to forget the first two years of the Troika, the closed doors, the "we won, you lost" put downs, the UAW bailout (no typo), the obscession with socialized medicine and lack of concern about jobs and the economy. The breath taking expansion of government spending. The blame America tour etc.
2010 happened because Obama forced it to happen.
I don't believe for a moment that I am flat our wrong as you say, but there's an election coming. We will see in 15 days if the tax the rich, because they, and George Bush, are to blame for everything, is a winner for Obama. For the hope of our children and grandchildren, America needs Obama's daze to be numbered -as in 15.
HOLRES
1:19 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012
Disingenuous claim about GM: Read this Forbes article: http://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/2012/08/29/automakers-report-card-who-still-owes-taxpayers-money-the-answer-might-surprise-you/
Jim Hatherley
1:27 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012
Thank you Holres, but is this the best you've got in defense of a failed Presidency?
Stephen Faris
2:30 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012
HOLRES,
What is your point. GM is still owned by the US Taxpayer(around 50%). Also, the US Taxpayer is down 50% from breakeven. So this means the stock which trades at around $24 should be at $50 for the US Tax Payer to break even. Does not sound like a good investment to me. Also, I dont like a socialist like Barack and and his buddies making decsions like that.
Steve Faris